Has anyone noticed the irony?
A black woman (Dean Davis of UT) is
stopping a white male from going to school. The UT chief of Police is
black and he is also stopping a white male from going to school. Yet,
black foot ball players charged with 3 counts of rape, 5 counts of assault, 16
failed drug tests, cocaine use continued to go to class.
I got a clean bill of health from
the UT psychiatrist, then reportedly banned from UT by a
black administration. Of course, it’s already illegal to harm
another human being. So what was
produced by the ban? If a person were
intent on breaking the law, and common morality to harm someone, how would a
‘ban’ offer protection? Click on the
hyperlinks below:
Here is the only reason
a ban was ever issued. (This
document will take a little while to download.
Be patient.)