THERE IS NO MANDANTORY STEROID TESTING FOR POLICE.

THERE IS NO MANDANTORY ADMISTRATION OF MMPI2 PSYCHIATRICT TESTING FOR POLICE.

PEOPLE WITH CRIMINAL TENDENCIES GRAVITATE TOWARD LAW ENFORCEMENT JOBS IN ORDER TO OBTAIN A RELATIVELY HIGH LEVEL OF IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION.

TESTING FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE BY POLICE IS A FACADE.

WHEN POLICE ENGAGE IN CRIME, THEY CHARGE THE VICTIM WITH CRIMINAL OFFENSES TO PROTECT THEMSELVES. THEY WILL SEIZE AS MUCH PROPERTY AS THEY CAN WHETHER THEY HAVE A SEARCH AND SEIZURE WARRANT OR NOT UNDER THE GUISE OF ‘EVIDENCE’. THE SEIZED PROPERTY IS ‘AUCTIONED’ TO THE POLICE FOR PENNIES ON THE DOLLAR. THE POLICE THEN SELL THE SEIZED PROPERTY FOR HUGE PROFITS. THIS PRACTICE IS NOTHING LESS THAN FENCING STOLEN PROPERTY AND THE PRACTICE IS ENABLED AND DEFENDED BY YOUR TAX DOLLARS.

THE PUBLIC ASSUMES THE REAL VICTIM IS GUILTY OF A CRIME BECAUSE THE POLICE HAVE CHARGED THEM WITH A CRIME. THE CLAIM WILL BE REPORTED BY THE MEDIA REGARDLESS OF TRUTH BECAUSE THE MEDIA CAN CIRCUMVENT RESPONSIBILITY BY ATTRIBUTING THE CLAIM TO THE POLICE. THE PUBLIC THEN ERRONEOUSLY CONCLUDES THAT POLICE ARE ACTING AGAINST A CRIME RATHER THAN PERPUTRATING CRIME.

SO, WHY WOULD A CONVICTION OCCUR IF A PERSON IS INNOCENT? STANDARD OPERATING PRACTICE IS TO CHARGE A SERIOUS FELONY, AND THEN COERCE THE DEFENDANT TO PLEA BARGIN TO A LESSER CHARGE. THE DEFENDANT RISKS CONVICTION OF A SERIOUS THOUGH ERRONEOUS CHARGE, IF THE DEFENDANT DOESN’T ACCEPT THE PLEA BARGIN. THIS IS ONE REASON WHY THE UNITED STATES INCARERATES MORE PEOPLE THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY EITHER BY PER CAPITA OR IN ABSOLUTE NUMBERS, INCLUDING COMMUNIST CHINA. TODAY, THE UNITED STATES HAS 2.1 MILLION MEN IN PRISON. THE ENTIRE COMBINED UNITED STATES MILITARY IS ABOUT 1.6 MILLION PERSONS INCLUDING NON-COMBATANTS. VIA ‘LAW ENFORCEMENT’, THE UNITED STATES HAS CREATED THE LARGEST STANDING ARMY IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE.

DISTRICT ATTORNEYS AND POLICE HAVE A SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP. DISTRICT ATTORNEYS EITHER DO WHAT POLICE TELL THEM TO DO OR DISTRICT ATTORNEYS LOSE THE PROTECTION OF THE POLICE. THIS RELATIONSHIP FORCES DISTRICT ATTORNEYS TO PROSECUTE PEOPLE THAT SHOULD NEVER BE PROSECUTED.

Police use excessive force, ER docs say

Wed Dec 24, 11:22 am ETNEW YORK (Reuters Health) – In a survey of a random sample of U.S. emergency physicians, virtually all said they believed that law enforcement officers use excessive force to arrest and detain suspects.

The sample included 315 respondents. While 99.8 percent believed excessive force is used, almost as many (97.8 percent) reported that they had managed cases that they suspected or that the patient stated had involved excessive use of force by law enforcement officers.

Nearly two thirds (65.3 percent) estimated that they had treated two or more cases of suspected excessive use of force per year among their patients, according to a report of the survey published in the January 2009 issue of the Emergency Medicine Journal.

Dr. Jared Strote of the University of Washington, Seattle, and a multicenter team also found that emergency physicians at public teaching hospitals were roughly four times more likely to report managing cases of suspected use of excessive force than those at university or community teaching emergency departments.

Blunt trauma inflicted by fists or feet was the most common type of injury cited in cases of suspected use of excessive force, followed by "overly tight" handcuffs.

Most emergency physicians (71.2 percent) admitted that they did not report cases of suspected use of excessive force by law enforcement officers.

A large majority (96.5 percent) reported that they had no departmental policies on reporting their suspicions or they did not know of a policy to guide their actions, and 93.7 percent said they had received no education or training in dealing with these situations.

However, most emergency physicians (69.5 percent) felt that it was within their scope of practice to refer cases of suspected use of excessive force for investigation and almost half (47.9 percent) felt that emergency physicians should be legally required to report cases of suspected use of excessive force by law enforcement officers.

These findings, Strote and colleagues conclude, "suggest that national emergency medicine organizations in the USA should become involved, jointly developing and advocating for guidelines to manage this complex issue."

SOURCE: Emergency Medicine Journal, January 2009.