ALL CONTENT SUPPLIED AND APPROVED BY LILLIAN BONNER; lillian_bonner@hotmail.com. 

 

DISTRICT ATTORNEY RANDALL NICHOLS

CAUGHT DEFRAUDING A GRAND JURY AGAIN

 

To:

Tennessee Bureau of Investigation

Attn.  Criminal Investigations

901 R. S. Gass Blvd.

Nashville, TN 37216

 

On August 27, 2008, the following facts were capitulated by Associate District Attorney Willie Harper Lane and thus recorded and preserved during official court proceedings:

 

8          “With

9          regard to aggravated assault number at 832288, where

10        Robert Lawson is the affiant, after speaking with the

11        officer today, the State and Officer Lawson believe

12        that we cannot go forward with this, as Officer

13        Lawson was not present at the time the defendant was

14        pointing the gun.”

 

A video and audio record of this capitulation may be viewed by using an internet browser and going to the following hyperlink:

 

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITe6vhrB1rA

 

An order by a judge is shown in entirety on the following pages confirming the charge was dismissed. Click here.

 

On April 29th, 2009, Knox County Sheriff’s Deputies Robert Lawson, Nick Carrol, and Knox County District Attorney Randall E. Nichols conspired to defraud a grand jury.  Officer Robert Lawson, Nick Carol testified before a grand jury, initiated, and approved by District Attorney Randall E. Nichols.  The entire indictment is attached.  However for brevity, note the section below of the indictment:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This document is signed by the hand of District Attorney Randall E. Nichols.

 

After the State withdrew the charge, and after a judge authorized and recorded the charge dismissed, District Attorney Randall E. Nichols, Officers Robert Lawson, and Nick Carol conspired to defraud a grand jury.

 

I believe that District Attorney Randall E. Nichols, Sheriff’s Deputies Robert Lawson, and Nick Carol engaged in:

 

1) Aggravated perjury. — T.C.A.  § 39-16-703.

2) Official oppression - T.C.A.  § 39-16-403

3) Official misconduct - T.C.A.  § 39-16-402

4) Inconsistent statements. — T.C.A.  § 39-16-707

5) Misuse of official information - T.C.A.  § 39-16-404

7) Subornation of perjury. - T.C.A. §39-16-705

 

I await your investigation, and response to provide further information,

 

Clifford Clark

 

 

AN OPEN LETTER TO GANNETT CORPORATION, PARENT COMPANY OF WBIR TV CLCK HERE

 

AN AMUSING MOTION CLICK HERE   3 QUESTIONS FOR DA NICHOLS  THE LEGAL SYSTEM   FROM YESSICA’S MOM CLICK HERE

 

THE AUTHOR OFFERS $5,000 EACH TO FOLLOWING PEOPLE TO TAKE AN MMPI PSYCHIATRIC TEST AND ALLOW THE AUTHOR TO POST THE RESULTS ON THE AUTHOR’S WEBPAGE:

 

SHERIFF’S DEPUTY NICHOLAS CARROL (I KNOW ABOUT YOUR PAST, BUDDY.  CLICK HERE)

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE DEAN OF STUDENTS MAXINE THOMPSON DAVIS (ORDERING AN ARREST OVER A WEB PAGE.  CLICK HERE.)

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE INSTRUCTOR ELIZABETH MCPHERSON (REQUESTED DISCIPLINARY ACTION FOR GIVING CANDY TO STUDENTS)

 

  TAKE THE MONEY AND THE TEST IF YOU’VE GOT NOTHING TO HIDE.

 

Click Here for A Message to District Attorney Randall Nichols

 

The following narrative is copyrighted.  All rights reserved, 2008, 2009.  Due to their size, some graphics my take some time to download.

 

Four associates were provided with nearly 50 copies each, the information referenced in the web page below, in letter format.  Nearly 200 copies of this letter have been addressed to state attorneys, congressmen, senators, and media outlets.  The first 15 copies have been sent to their intended recipients. The remaining ~ 185 copies are held in reserve. Without continuous communication between the author and his associates, the remaining ~ 185 copies will be delivered to their intended recipients. Discontinue use if rash develops.

 

 

 

POLICE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, REDFLEX

CAUGHT LYING

 

District Attorney Nichols and Knoxville Police Officer Cox 1811 have been caught engaging in Felony Aggravated perjury - T.C.A.  § 39-16-703, upon a grand jury to fraudulently obtain an indictment.  DA Nichols and KPD Officer Cox 1811 have also been caught engaging in Felony Official Misconduct T.C.A.  § 39-16-402, and Felony Official oppression - T.C.A. § 39-16-403.   Other Charges are detailed within this document.  Perhaps the next indictment DA Nichols will seek will be from his very own prison cell.  The author will accommodate any delays necessary for his prison-mates to get to know him well. 

 

Now DA Nichols, demonstrate your modus operandi by retaliating for having the truth told so additional charges against you and your operatives can be publicized.  Four associates with power of attorney are standing by to pursue redress whether you have me killed, or once again falsely imprisoned, and subsequently killed by an inmate.  The world is watching.  Google recorded 3.6 million hits for the author and red light camera after the Knoxville Police Department propagated their fraudulent claims all over the world.  Pay back is hell.

If the prosecution now moves forward after revelation of the exculpatory evidence, those involved will be held accountable for Felony Official Misconduct, Felony Official Oppression, as well as vulnerability to civil litigation under Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991).

 

To Assistant District Attorney, Willie Lane:  The author wishes to express his deepest appreciation for Assistant District Attorney Willie Lane for having been the biggest ASSet throughout this ordeal.  The author is grateful for her ASSistance in exposing both her own boss and police officers. The author looks forward to her continued ASSistance in providing further opportunities to successfully prosecute those that have attempted to fraudulently prosecute the author.

 

 

 

Response to Indictment of Case No. 90252, Grand Jury No. I-0908-80, A, with counter claims and proof of criminal acts perpetrated by:

 

Knoxville Tennessee Police Officer James Cox 1811,

Knoxville Tennessee District Attorney Randall E. Nichols,

Redflex Corporation

 

(This document contains 21 pages)

 

Corruption within the city and county government of Knoxville Tennessee has necessitated the dissemination of the information contained within this document beyond the confines of the Knox County and Knoxville City governments:

 

Table of Contents (these titles are hyperlinks.  you may click to jump to a particular section.  However, I recommend reading the entire naarative.)

Table of Contents.. 1

Charges levied against Knoxville Tennessee Officer James Cox 1811. 2

    Testimony under oath of Officer James Cox.. 3

Affidavit of Officer James Cox. 4

Police Report of Officer James Cox. 5

Testimony under oath of Officer James Cox 2. 6

Testimony under oath of Officer Jason Keck. 7

Conclusory proof of evidence tampering.. 8

Officer James Cox invents the act of “Fleeing”. 9

District Attorney RANDALL E. NICHOLS invents Cox’s danger. 10

CHARGES LEVIED AGAINST KNOXVILLE TENNESSEE District Attorney RANDALL E. NICHOLS.. 13

INOPERATIVE CAMERA.. 15

Redflex Commits Aggravated Perjury.. 16

Charges Levied against Redflex Corporation.. 20

A little more about District Attorney Randy Nichols and Assistant District Attorney Samyah Jubran. 21

 

How many innocent people have been sent to prison by District Attorney Randall E. Nichols or Officer James Cox?

 

- End of page 1 -

 
Charges levied against Knoxville Tennessee Officer James Cox 1811

 

Mr. Clark respectfully demands that Officer Cox 1811, be arrested and relieved of duty for:

 

1) Aggravated perjury. — T.C.A.  § 39-16-703.

 

 (a)  A person commits an offense who, with intent to deceive:

        (1)  Commits perjury as defined in § 39-16-702;

        (2) The false statement is made during or in connection with an official proceeding; and

        (3)  The false statement is material.

(b)  It is no defense that the person mistakenly believed the statement to be immaterial.

(c)  Aggravated perjury is a Class D felony.

 

2) Official oppression - T.C.A.  § 39-16-403 prohibits abuse of power by a public servant. Official oppression Class E felony.

 

3) Official misconduct - T.C.A.  § 39-16-402 applies to public servants and candidates for office and prohibits unauthorized exercise of official power, acting in an official capacity exceeding the servant's power, refusal to perform a duty imposed by law, violating a law relating to the servant's office or employment, and receiving a benefit not provided by law.

 

Official misconduct is a Class E felony with penalty of not less than one (1) year nor more than six (6) years in prison. In addition, the jury may assess a fine not to exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000), unless otherwise provided by statute

 

4) Inconsistent statements. — T.C.A.  § 39-16-707

 

Except as provided in § 39-16-704, a charge of perjury or aggravated perjury that alleges the person charged has made two (2) or more statements under oath, any two (2) of which cannot both be true, need not allege which statement is false if both statements were made within the period of the statute of limitations. At trial, the prosecution need not prove which statement is false.

 

5) Misuse of official information - T.C.A.  § 39-16-404

 

The author have received a bill from Redflex claiming the author owes them damages as a result of Cox’s, Keck’s, and Nichols perjury.  The author was defamed by this fraudulent confession.  An indictment was fraudulently obtained by Cox’s and Nichol’s perjury.  A public servant commits an offense that, by reason of information to which the public servant has access in the public servant's official capacity and that has not been made public, attains or aids another to attain a benefit.  An offense of Misuse of official information is a Class B misdemeanor.

An offense of Misuse of official information is a Class B misdemeanor.

 

6) Ouster law - T.C.A. §   8-47-101

-Sets out conduct that is punishable by ouster from office, including misconduct in office and neglect of duty.

 

7) Subornation of perjury. - T.C.A. §39-16-705

 

(a)  A person commits an offense that, with the intent to deceive, induces another to make a false statement constituting perjury or aggravated perjury.

(b)  Subornation of perjury is a Class A misdemeanor. Subornation of aggravated perjury is a Class E felony.

 

- End of page 2 -

Beginning of narration … The reader should read the whole narrative to understand the extent of the crimes that have committed by DA Nichols, and Officer Cox.


Testimony under oath of Officer James Cox

From the preliminary hearing transcripts, page 17, lines 15 through 22:

 

 

 

Mr. Clark adamantly denies discharging a firearm.  No where in the preliminary hearing does anyone make any statement that Mr. Clark confessed to any possible crime.  Below is the affidavit sworn under oath by Officer James Cox:

- End of page 3 -

 

Affidavit of Officer James Cox

 

The affidavit by Officer James Cox excludes any confession of any possible crime.

 

Notice the following statement made by Officer James Cox and submitted to a grand jury by District Attorney Randall E. Nichols.  Long after the alleged incident, James Cox invents a confession which is contradicted within James Cox’s preliminary hearing testimony, and the sworn Affidavit authored by Officer James Cox.  However, the invented confession is just the beginning of his perjury.  More importantly, Officer Cox revises his entire testimony, affidavits, carefully to eliminate all exculpatory evidence.  Knoxville District Attorney Randall E. Nichols maliciously excludes all exculpatory evidence when presenting to a grand jury to fraudulently obtain an indictment:

 

- End of page 4 -

 

 


Police Report of Officer James Cox

 

Notice that Officer Cox fraudulently recounts a confession above, but specifically excludes the possibility of confession under oath at the preliminary hearing, and the Affidavit of Complaint.  Notice that Cox changes the entire sequence of events, and invents events in his report to the grand jury. Notice that Cox changes his narrative of the initial position of responding twice in his own documentation.  Both positions testified by Cox are contradicted by the GPS coordinates in his own police car dash camera.  The real dash camera GPS position at the initial response will be noted later in this narrative. Notice that Cox testifies that 4 shots were heard before responding, but then changes the sequence of events for the narrative presented to the grand jury. The importance of this alteration will become evident further in this narrative.

 

- End of page 5 -

 

Officer Cox claims in the report above: 

Testimony under oath of Officer James Cox 2

 

Officer James Cox testifies under oath in the preliminary hearing, page 17 of the transcripts:

 

 

Mr. Clark adamantly denies discharging a firearm.  Officer James Cox fraudulently invented Mens rea, and Actus reus unambiguously confirmed by the inconsistency of sworn testimony of Officer James Cox.

 

- End of page 6 -

 


Once again, from Officer’s Cox report sent to the grand jury:

 

 

Testimony under oath of Officer Jason Keck

-From the preliminary hearing transcripts, page 47, lines 15 through 22:

 

 

-And page 48 from Assistant District Attorney Willie to Officer Jason Keck:

Officer James Cox fraudulently invented Mens rea, unambiguously confirmed by the inconsistency of sworn testimony of Officer Jason Keck and Officer James Cox.


- End of page 7 -

 

 

Conclusory proof of evidence tampering:

 

- From page 19 of the preliminary hearing transcripts:

 

 

Now read this from Attorney District Attorney Willie Lane, page 70 of the preliminary hearing:

 

 

 

How did 3 shell casings alleged to have been found by police in a parking lot end up in a box in Mr. Clark’s car?    Again, Officer James Cox fraudulently invented Mens rea, and Actus reus unambiguously confirmed by the inconsistency of sworn testimony of Officer James Cox.

 

- End of page 8 -


Officer James Cox invents the act of “Fleeing”

 

Refer to James Cox’s statement on page 4:

 

 

Now refer to District Attorney Willie Lane’s statement on page 45 of the preliminary hearing transcripts:

 

 

 

You may view the approximately15 mph speed of travel of Mr. Clark’s vehicle by clicking here, or by typing:

 

www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkNfdrWaMkU

 

within an internet browser. Also, the viewer should be cognizant of all the traffic on Broadway, despite District Attorney Willie Lane’s misrepresentation that Mr. Clark was the only one in the area.

 

Again, Officer James Cox fraudulently invented Mens rea, and Actus reus unambiguously illustrated by the inconsistency of sworn testimony of Officer James Cox, Willie Lane, and the police dash camera video.

 

- End of page 9 -


District Attorney RANDALL E. NICHOLS invents Cox’s danger

Notice that Cox states that ‘shots’ and Mr. Clark’s position were explicitly behind Pittman’s Auto in his narrative.  The latitude and longitude are:

 

North

36.1.12'

West

083.55.295'

Though earlier he says he doesn’t know where the shots came from: page 8, line 17 of transcripts and affidavit.

 

The red light camera alleged to have been shot was located at latitude and longitude:

 

North

36.01.190'

West

083.55.295'

 

Notice that Officer James Cox is shown in the police car dash camera below, responding to this alleged incident from the latitude and longitude of (see red circle below):

 

 

The video demonstrating and confirming Officer Cox’s initial responding position can be viewed by clicking here, or by typing www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJLKwKf-msw

 

 The police car dash video dispels any contradictory claims of any other position when Officer James Cox responded.  Cox and Nichols purposefully lied to a grand jury to fraudulently obtain an indictment.

 

I received some questions from readers about the latitude and longitude reported by Cox’s dash camera.  The longitude and latitude reported by the dash cam are given in decimal format. Google Earth plots by degrees, minutes, and seconds.  A Federal Communications Commission conversion link is given below, so that you can plot the lat and lon for yourself.  If you look at the building where the upper red arrow points on the map below, you can see the wall that Cox was facing in the police video when he switched on his lights and bolted from the parking lot on to Broadway and toward the red light camera. 

 

- End of page 10 -

 

 

This latitude and longitude are plotted on Google Earth:

 

 

You can check the coordinates yourself with this converter:

 

http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/DDDMMSS-decimal.html

 

Review the Affidavit of Complaint of Officer James Cox on page 4:

 

Officer Cox testifies that four shots occurred before looking for ‘the shooter’.  Now, read the completely revised account that District Attorney Randall E. Nichols sent to the Grand Jury:

 

- End of page 11 -

 

 


 

Not only did District Attorney Randall E. Nichols present a fraudulent confession to the grand jury, District Attorney Randall E. Nichols and Officer James Cox further committed aggravated perjury to obtain an indictment by fraudulently placing Officer Cox in a location contradicted by Officer Cox’s dash camera, and Officer Cox’s Affidavit of Complaint.  Officer Cox completely revised his narrative for the grand jury.  District Attorney Randall Nichols had every item displayed in this webpage available to him when he chose to seek an indictment.  District Randall Nichols removed all exculpatory evidence from the presentation to the grand jury.  Cox and Nichols engaged in Felony Official Oppression and Felony Official Misconduct as well as Felony Aggravated Perjury.

 

- End of page 12 -

 

CHARGES LEVIED AGAINST KNOXVILLE TENNESSEE District Attorney RANDALL E. NICHOLS

Mr. Clark respectfully demands that District Attorney Randall E. Nichols be arrested and relieved of sevice for:

 

1) Aggravated perjury. — T.C.A.  § 39-16-703.

 

 (a)  A person commits an offense who, with intent to deceive:

        (1)  Commits perjury as defined in § 39-16-702;

        (2)  The false statement is made during or in connection with an official proceeding; and

        (3)  The false statement is material.

(b)  It is no defense that the person mistakenly believed the statement to be immaterial.

(c)  Aggravated perjury is a Class D felony.

 

2) Official oppression - T.C.A.  § 39-16-403 prohibits abuse of power by a public servant. Official oppression Class E felony

 

3) Official misconduct - T.C.A.  § 39-16-402 applies to public servants and candidates for office and prohibits unauthorized exercise of official power, acting in an official capacity exceeding the servant's power, refusal to perform a duty imposed by law, violating a law relating to the servant's office or employment, and receiving a benefit not provided by law.

 

Official misconduct is a Class E felony with penalty of not less than one (1) year nor more than six (6) years in prison. In addition, the jury may assess a fine not to exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000), unless otherwise provided by statute

 

4) Inconsistent statements. — T.C.A.  § 39-16-707

 

Except as provided in § 39-16-704, a charge of perjury or aggravated perjury that alleges the person charged has made two (2) or more statements under oath, any two (2) of which cannot both be true, need not allege which statement is false if both statements were made within the period of the statute of limitations. At trial, the prosecution need not prove which statement is false.

 

5) Misuse of official information - T.C.A.  § 39-16-404

 

 I have received a bill from Redflex claiming my I owe them damages as a result of Cox’s, Keck’s, and Nichols perjury.  I was defamed by this fraudulent confession.  An indictment was fraudulently obtained by Cox’s perjury. A public servant commits an offense that, by reason of information to which the public servant has access in the public servant's official capacity and that has not been made public, attains or aids another to attain a benefit.  An offense of Misuse of official information is a Class B misdemeanor.

 

6) Ouster law - T.C.A. §   8-47-101

-Sets out conduct that is punishable by ouster from office, including misconduct in office and neglect of duty.

 

 

- End of page 13 -

 

 

 

Officer Cox’s testimony, affidavit, and report places Mr. Clark behind Pittman’s business:

 

 

Notice that there is no line of sight from position A, B, or C to the red light camera.  Position D does have an apparent line of sight to the back side of the red light camera, but position D is explicitly excluded in Cox’s testimony, affidavit, and report, as well as the police video.

 

-         But, there’s more …

- End of page 14 -


INOPERATIVE CAMERA

 

Examine the preliminary hearing transcript, bottom of page 55 (the entire transcript page is on page 16 of this narrative):

 

 

Top of page 56 of the preliminary hearing transcripts:

 

 

2100 hours is 9:00 P.M, November 24th 2007.  Officer James Cox’s dash camera shows himself responding at 1:35 A.M, the day after, but he lied about that and put 1:53 AM on his Affidavit of Complaint, and then he lied about that time for the grand jury documents and changed the time to 1:45 AM. Regardless, the camera became inoperative many hours before any police claimed they heard shots and many hours before Mr. Clark was illegally stopped and falsely arrested.

 

- End of page 15 -

 


Redflex Commits Aggravated Perjury

Redflex under oath during the Preliminary Hearing transcripts page 55:

 

- End of page 16 -

 

 

 

Here is the spreadsheet of repair costs submitted by Redflex during the preliminary hearing under oath:

- End of page 17 -

 

 


Now let’s examine the documents Redflex provided to District Attorney Randall E. Nichols and that District Attorney Randall E. Nichols provided to defraud a grand jury:

 

Total Cost of the Camera:

 

- End of page 18 -

 

 

 

Total Cost of the Camera repairs submitted to the grand jury:

 

- End of page 19 -

 

Charges Levied against Redflex Corporation

 

Mr. Clark respectfully demands that Redflex Corporation be indicted for:

 

1) Aggravated perjury. — T.C.A.  § 39-16-703.

 

 (a)  A person commits an offense who, with intent to deceive:

        (1)  Commits perjury as defined in § 39-16-702;

        (2)  The false statement is made during or in connection with an official proceeding; and

        (3)  The false statement is material.

(b)  It is no defense that the person mistakenly believed the statement to be immaterial.

(c)  Aggravated perjury is a Class D felony.

 

2) Inconsistent statements. — T.C.A.  § 39-16-707

 

Except as provided in § 39-16-704, a charge of perjury or aggravated perjury that alleges the person charged has made two (2) or more statements under oath, any two (2) of which cannot both be true, need not allege which statement is false if both statements were made within the period of the statute of limitations. At trial, the prosecution need not prove which statement is false.

 

- End of page 20 -

 

A little more about District Attorney Randy Nichols and Assistant District Attorney Samyah Jubran.

 

Notice in the following report that there is no ambiguity that Assistant District Attorney Samyah Jubran drove through an intersection with a stop sign without stopping, and after drinking an alcoholic beverage.  Yet, she was not given a citation for driving through an intersection with a stop sign regardless of impairment.

 

www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWtGxcZWUgw 

 

or by clicking here.

 

“In the video Officer Dururvurur says, "Here's the deal. You are in no shape to be driving."

 

“ -But DeBusk maintains that is a tactic used by officers to obtain more information.”

 

DeBusk is a spokesperson for Knoxville Police Department.  So, DeBusk states that lying is a tactic routinely used by KPD officers.

 

Assistant District Attorney Samyah Jubran has refused to prosecute cops for breaking the law.

 

During the discovery of illegal vehicle towing contracted by the City of Knoxville, District Attorney Randy Nichols made a public plea for victims to come and file complaints against the perpetrators. Then, District Attorney Randy Nichols ignored complaints.

 

District Attorney Randall Nichols refused to prosecute 3 assailants that left me disfigured, although I could identify all of them.  Click here for the pictures.

 

Again DA Nichols, demonstrate your modus operandi by retaliating for having the truth told so additional charges against you and your operatives can be publicized.  Four associates with power of attorney are standing by to pursue redress whether you have me killed or once again falsely imprisoned, and subsequently killed by an inmate.  The world is watching.  Google recorded 3.6 million hits for the author and red light camera after the Knoxville Police Department propagated their fraudulent claims all over the world.  Pay back is hell.

If the prosecution now moves forward after revelation of the exculpatory evidence, those involved will be held accountable for Felony Official Misconduct, Felony Official Oppression, as well as vulnerability to civil litigation under Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991).

 

 

-         End of page 21 –

 

If you’d like to read more about this complex story, continue below:

 

How did those camera-charges that lay dormant for almost a year suddenly end up as an indictment? Is justice slow?  Were the courts clogged?  - Nope. The author checked the criminal court docket on a bi-weekly basis.  The case was never on the docket, until mid October, nearly a year after the author’s false arrest when an indictment was suddenly issued after the case spent virtually no time on the docket.  How did this anomaly occur? 

 

As the reader may know, the author will post just about any relevant truth on this website. Mid-October, Assistant District Willie threaten to have the author arrested for material on this website.  Willie makes more idle threats than a World Wrestling Federation TV wrestler. However, instead of cowering, the author placed Willie’s threats on the website. Days later, an indictment was issued for charges that were nearly a year old without previously having been on the criminal docket.  That indictment allowed the author to expose both Willie’s boss and the cops engaging in felony aggravated perjury, felony official oppression, and felony official misconduct; not to mention other crimes.  Thank you, Willie.  I love you baby-doll.  Willie works in General Session Court, but just happened to show up in criminal court when my indictment was read aloud. What a coincidence!  However, she wanted me arrested, but no arrest took place: coitus interruptus!  Nevertheless, after Sheriff’s deputies permanently damaged my left shoulder, I can no longer put both of my hands behind my back.  I suspect they’ll break my shoulder the next contrived arrest, and then claim they were just following procedure.

 

So how did the University of Tennessee get involved in any of this?  The University of Tennessee has about 4 times the number administrators as it needs to function at peak efficiency. To justify the existence of all of these superfluous positions while at the same time eliminating academic programs and eliminating classes, while increasing tuition, The University involves itself in issues that do not concern the university. The University of Tennessee brought charges against the author in parallel to the red light charges although the alleged incident had no relevance to The University whatsoever.  The University administrators trapped the University in a libelous situation.  Since then, the University has sought every possible way, shape or form of persecuting the author to justify their initial involvement and protect themselves from litigation.  Below, you’ll see how Assistant District Attorney Lane tried to protect The University.  Here is the expounded story of their PhD folly:

 

THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE CONSPIRED TO ENDANGER THEIR OWN STUDENTS

TO COVER ILLEGAL ACTIVITY

 

THE AUTHOR IS TWICE AN HONOR GRADUATE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE

 

 

This incredulous headline is well supported by documentation available to the reader:

 

1)   The University of Tennessee had the author arrested for the content of author’s website mildly critical of UT’s policies, yet fabricated a trespassing charge, after sending an invitation to come to campus. Document 1 takes a little time to download, but is essential. Document 1 was obtained from the University of Tennessee Judicial Office by subpoena.  Notice that the documentation specifically excludes every other possible reason for a ban except criticism of the University. Click here for document 1.  Click here for document 2. 

 

2)   The University of Tennessee stamped “Disciplinary Action” authorized by Dean Maxine Thompson Davis on the author’s transcripts covering two graduations with honors, even though no disciplinary action occurred, nor has the author ever had a hearing at UT.  UT deliberately damaged the author’s employability.  Yet, the author has paid tens of thousands of dollars to that University. 

 

3)   Without a legitimate reason to ban the author, the University of Tennessee faces possible loss of accreditation from the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and financially damaging litigation.  Click here for documentation.

 

4)   The University of Tennessee engaged in a purposeful, concerted effort of defamation specifically to invent a reason for a ban that would circumvent due process of law, possible loss of accreditation and financially damaging litigation.  Click here for documentation.

 

5)   The University of Tennessee’s ruse is directly contradicted by the University’s own staff.  Click here for the documentation.

 

6)   The University of Tennessee is well aware of the studies elaborating on the causes of both the Virginia Tech and Columbine Massacres.  These studies were publicized in the University’s own newspaper, “The Daily Beacon”.  Click here to see the documentation.

 

7)   The University of Tennessee Administration engaged in a concerted effort to duplicate the causes of the Virginia Tech and Columbine Massacres.  Click here for documentation.

 

8)   Students at the University of Tennessee were ordered by the administration to disassociate from the author for ‘legal reasons’ (rather than illegal reasons) thereby further recreating the causes for both the Virginia Tech and Columbine Massacres. Please refer to line number 6.

 

9)   If the University had been successful in creating a Virginia Tech and Columbine style massacre, the University would be spared an investigation into their accreditation, and financially damaging litigation for malicious prosecution, perjury, breech of due process of law, breech of UT’s own bylaws, and breech of accreditation requirements of the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges.

 

10)                   The University of Tennessee engaged in perjury to obtain an arrest warrant for the author.  Click here to see the documentation.

 

11)                   Plain clothes, unidentifiable sheriff’s deputies broken into the author’s home.  When the author defended his life, deputies then identified themselves and piled on erroneous charges.  If not for the author’s shot gun and cell phone on speaker, the author would not be alive. This home invasion was by direction of the administration of the University of Tennessee, and is further evidence of attempting to create a justification for UT’s illegal activities.  Neither deputy was harmed, yet the author had the tendons in his arm torn resulting in painful surgery and lengthy recovery.  No resistance to arrest was ever charged, nor claimed. Nine thousand dollars of the author’s property was stolen by the deputies.  Click here for documentation.  Dean Maxine Thompson Davis approved of this contrived arrest, subsequent incarceration while demonstrating a complete disregard for human life.

 

12)                   The author underwent physical assault by 3 people after deputies tore tendons in the author’s arm.  Yet, the same sheriff's department that broke into the author’s home, tore tendons in the author’s arm, and stole over $9000 of property, refused to arrest the violent assailants, and the DA refused to prosecute the violent assailants.  Click here for documentation. Sheriff JJ is a UT alumnus.

 

13)                   Prosecutor Willie Lane went to great lengths to prevent a judge from knowing that the University had the author arrested because of his website.  Click here for the documentation.

 

14)                   Prosecutor Willie Lane threatened the author with arrest once again, for his website.  She is attempting to intimidate the witness.

 

15)                   Prosecutor Willie Lane threatened to raise the author’s bail on erroneous, contrived charges.

 

16)                   Prosecutor Willie Lane invented a non-existent ballistics report purportedly incriminating the author for purposes of coercing a plea bargain.  There will be no plea bargains.  The author’s estate will pursue litigation if the aforementioned nuts or their operatives kill the author. 

 

17)                   The University of Tennessee’s perversion of the 14th Amendment: Click here.

 

18)                      The University of Tennessee, the Sheriff’s Office and the district attorney are hoping for an erroneous conviction to shield them from litigation. What they don’t understand is their futile effort to obtain a conviction won’t make any difference.  A jury will be apprised that the author was arrested specifically and only because of a previous website mildly critical of UT.  Just try to suppress that evidence when more than 200,000 people have already read it for themselves, and § 1983 grants relief for such travesties.  Any further effort to hide this fact or defame the author will further incriminate the UT administration, the sheriff’s office, and the district attorney.  All the lawyers in the world aren’t going to save them from eventual defeat in the court room regardless of circumstance.  Please reference Richard Nixon’s involvement in the Watergate cover up. Law enforcement was unable to successfully prosecute on previous erroneous charges, so a second attempt to contrive charges by breaking into the author’s house was executed. This attempt will fail also, and has exposed the Knox County Sheriff’s Office, and the district attorney to litigation.

  

SCENES FROM INCARCERATON   THE MYTH OF IMMUNITY

 

If you have difficulty believing the statements made within this web page, carefully re-examine the documents provided.  Additionally, I want you learn about something that school won’t teach you: Operation Northwoods  Click on the hyperlink, and read. 

 

 

The University administration has little concern for your children, your children’s careers or your children’s future. The University wants your MONEY. My credentials for this assertion are that I am twice an honor graduate from the University of Tennessee; once in Engineering and once in Psychology. I also have completed graduate work in both areas as well as having had a distinguished career.  Yet, I’m prevented from volunteering to tutor students in calculus. 

 

The University confiscated all of the equipment purchased by the students of the canoe and hiking club with the student’s own money. The totalitarian administration of University of Tennessee now requires the students to borrow the equipment that the students purchased themselves.

 

The University can fail a student and then charge them again for taking the same course.  Suppose we change that policy.  A student pays once for a course, no matter how many times they have to repeat it. Stand back and watch the quality of instruction soar.  Stand back and watch instructor salaries increase and administrator’s salaries decrease. No longer will a fire hose of data be sprayed on students, and then a grading curved used to pass or fail them. A staggering 190,000 people in the United States are killed every year by preventable medical accidents.  If you sum-total all deaths due to firearms, automobiles, and terrorism in the United States, about half that number is the result. We have met the enema, and he is us.  How do you suppose such travesties occur? A significant contribution is our facade of an educational system.  We can no longer afford ineffective practices in a global economy.  Profanity is used in the following video:

 

The knowledge a student needs to excel in their careers will not be taught, and the knowledge students are taught is largely superfluous.  The University wants your MONEY. Their whole structure is constructed to take parent’s retirement money, and bury the students in debt.  Shortly, a University credit card will be pushed on your children so that the University takes the interest upon the debt with which they indenture their students. While University claims to make money from UT sponsored sports, they take money from the students to support their sport programs and pay administrators exorbitant sums of money while short changing instructors.  Yet, the reader will purchase UT logo merchandise as some sort of perverted status symbol.

What is occurring at the University of Tennessee is exactly what the public just witnessed from Wall Street.  The administrators of the University of Tennessee will do anything they can get way with for as long as they can get away with it, without regard to the consequences. Further, the public is responding exactly the way they did to the collapse on Wall Street. They do nothing.

 

UNIVERSITY THEFT   DECLINING VALUE OF A COLLEGE EDUCATION

 

WHERE YOU’RE MONEY IS GOING    WHERE YOU’RE MONEY WENT

 

22 YEAR OLD WOMAN AUCTIONS OFF HER VIRGINITY TO PAY FOR HER COLLEGE LOANS

 

THE PRELIMINARY HEARING WAS A LITANY OF PERJURY:

 

PERJURY TO GET AN ARREST WARRNT

DEPUTIES COMMIT PERJURY PART 1

DEPUTIES COMMIT PERJURY PART 2

DEPUTIES COMMIT PERJURY PART 3

DEPUTIES COMMIT PERJURY PART 4

DEPUTIES COMMIT PERJURY PART 5

THE PROSECUTOR PART 1

THE PROSECUTOR PART 2

THE PROSECUTOR PART 3

THE JUDGE PART 1

THE JUDGE PART 2

THE MYTH OF IMMUNITY

THE ENTIRE HEARING UNINTERRUPTED

 

I have been attacked twice.

 Click here to see the pictures. I have also received documentation indicating that the Sheriff’s office is going to attempt to implicate me in yet another fantasy crime. If I’m found floating face down in the river or murdered (“apparent suicide”) in a jail cell on some bogus charge, you’ll know it was the sheriff’s department working in concert with the University of Tennessee.  The documentation has been given to my attorneys.  I have the names of the officers involved and I know about the scheme that is being devised.  I will not take any plea bargains, and I will not release any of these corrupt officials from justice. 

 

Self-perpetuating Legal System: Hopefully in the future, whenever you read about some one being charged by a law enforcement agency, you’ll recognize the charges are often nothing but provocation or retaliation by the law enforcement agency and have nothing to do with criminal activity.  In reality, a person is considered guilty until proven innocent, rather than innocent until proven guilty.  Police will pile on erroneous charges so that a person spends tens of thousand of dollars to prove their innocence.  Hypothermia and physical threats are used routinely in local incarceration.  If such activity were practiced in Guantanamo Bay, an investigation would be held, the perpetrators brought to justice, and the practice ended.  Yet locally, these practices are endorsed and thrive.  Click here to see scenes from incarceration.

 

OBSERVATIONS CONCERNING LAW ENFORCEMENTclick here

 

Friend to Cliff: “Cliff, you’ve got to pick your battles.”

Cliff to Friend: “I did.  I picked the battle for justice.”

 

PLEASE BOYCOTT THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AS BEST AS YOU ARE ABLE. 

THANK YOU.

 

 

Alexander Solzhenitsyn died at age 89 on 0-8-04-08.  Many Americans do not recognize Solzhenitsyn.

In 1944, Solzhenitsyn was a captain in the Soviet Army fighting against the Nazis.  As if this bravery weren’t enough, Alexander began to criticize Joseph Stalin.  As a consequence of his criticism, Alexander spent 8 years doing back-breaking labor in Soviet Gulags. His major novels uncover the hidden world of prisons, labor camps, and food shortages.  His books, which were best sellers in the West, destroyed any remaining sympathy for the Communist regime among left-wing intellectuals, and inspired millions with the message that personal courage can defeat a totalitarian regime.  I hope this short mention of Alexander inspires the reader to learn more about this unique man of history.

 

A LITTLE ABOUT CLIFF:

 

Some men are born to greatness. Other men have greatness thrust firmly up their rectums.

 

Connie baby sat me when I was 5 years old

Connie and Me, and the standard of death in America. Connie’s family is from Calabria, Italy.  Calabria is the ‘toe of boot’ of Italy.  Cliff’s family is from Sicily, the Italian island near the seaside tip of Calabria

 

This is Cliff’s sponsored Child in Guatemala.  Of course, Cliff sent her teddy bears!  Doesn’t she make your heart melt?

 

The following are former employees of Cliff, and people that continue to be friends:

 

 

 

 

Cliff’s words: A special note on this woman:  We were almost married.  She is a practicing Muslim.  This was a very different world for me to explore.  I was a non-practicing Catholic.  Since before the 11th century, our respective ethnicities and cultures have been trying to kill one another.  It took me a little while to get comfortable with someone that put on clothing like this:

 

 

 

5 times each day she would dress like this, unroll a prayer mat, place a prayer stone (Shiite) on the mat, face Mecca, and pray just like you’ve seen on the fear-inducing nightly news.  It was slightly unnerving at first, and then it became endearing.  Was this so far removed from customs of nuns in the Catholic Church?  I carried a compass so that she could find Mecca when we traveled.  I would lie on my back in front of her when she prayed. When she bowed down our lips would touch.  I’d kiss her during her prayer bows.  Is this apostasy?  Am I to be killed by Fatwah, or by the Knox County Sheriff’s Office? Is there a difference?

 

ERIN

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Erin was my aerobatic babe. She exudes femininity.  Everything she touches melts with compliance, including me. Erin is now married and her kind husband allows us to go on ‘dates’. We go dining, dancing, and then we go back to her place … and I sit and talk with her husband.  He’s cool. I like him. I wished I had the opportunity to take each reader up in the sky and turn them upside down a few times, hang in the straps and watch the world pass beneath inverted.

 

MAI

 

 

Mai was my Vietnamese squeeze.  Boy, did she have a temper.  Fortunately, because of her accent, I could not understand anything she said when she was angry.  So, I rarely took offense.  We dated for four months before I ever kissed her.

 

The people that have shared their lives with me are as numerous as the stars in the sky.  When I look up at night, I am reminded of each one.  I am deeply grateful for every one of them.  Thank you for letting me share a small portion of my life with you.