ALL CONTENT SUPPLIED
AND APPROVED BY LILLIAN BONNER; lillian_bonner@hotmail.com.
DISTRICT
ATTORNEY RANDALL NICHOLS
CAUGHT
DEFRAUDING A GRAND JURY AGAIN
To:
Attn. Criminal Investigations
On August 27, 2008, the following facts were
capitulated by
8
“With
9
regard to aggravated assault number at 832288, where
10 Robert Lawson is the affiant, after speaking with
the
11
officer today, the State and Officer Lawson believe
12 that
we cannot go forward with this, as Officer
13
Lawson was not present at the time the defendant was
14
pointing the gun.”
A video and audio record of this capitulation may be
viewed by using an internet browser and going to the following hyperlink:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITe6vhrB1rA
An order by a judge is shown in entirety on the
following pages confirming the charge was dismissed. Click here.
On April 29th, 2009,

This document is signed by the hand of District
Attorney Randall E. Nichols.
After the State withdrew the charge, and after a judge
authorized and recorded the charge dismissed, District Attorney Randall E.
Nichols, Officers Robert Lawson, and Nick Carol conspired to defraud a grand
jury.
I believe that District Attorney Randall E. Nichols,
Sheriff’s Deputies Robert Lawson, and Nick Carol engaged in:
1) Aggravated perjury. — T.C.A. § 39-16-703.
2) Official oppression - T.C.A. § 39-16-403
3) Official misconduct - T.C.A. § 39-16-402
4) Inconsistent statements. — T.C.A. § 39-16-707
5) Misuse of official information - T.C.A. § 39-16-404
7) Subornation of perjury. - T.C.A. §39-16-705
I await your investigation, and response to provide
further information,
Clifford Clark

AN OPEN LETTER TO GANNETT CORPORATION, PARENT
COMPANY OF WBIR TV CLCK HERE
AN
AMUSING MOTION CLICK
HERE 3 QUESTIONS FOR
DA NICHOLS THE LEGAL SYSTEM FROM
YESSICA’S MOM CLICK HERE
THE AUTHOR OFFERS
$5,000 EACH TO FOLLOWING PEOPLE TO TAKE AN MMPI PSYCHIATRIC TEST AND ALLOW THE
AUTHOR TO POST THE RESULTS ON THE AUTHOR’S WEBPAGE:
SHERIFF’S DEPUTY NICHOLAS CARROL (I KNOW ABOUT YOUR PAST, BUDDY. CLICK HERE)
UNIVERSITY OF
TENNESSEE DEAN OF STUDENTS MAXINE THOMPSON
UNIVERSITY OF
TAKE THE MONEY AND THE TEST IF YOU’VE GOT NOTHING TO HIDE.
Click Here for A Message to District Attorney Randall
Nichols
The following narrative
is copyrighted. All rights reserved,
2008, 2009. Due to their size, some
graphics my take some time to download.
Four associates were
provided with nearly 50 copies each, the information referenced in the web page
below, in letter format. Nearly 200
copies of this letter have been addressed to state attorneys, congressmen, senators,
and media outlets. The first 15 copies
have been sent to their intended recipients. The remaining ~ 185 copies are
held in reserve. Without continuous communication between the author and his
associates, the remaining ~ 185 copies will be delivered to their intended
recipients. Discontinue use if rash develops.
POLICE,
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, REDFLEX
CAUGHT
LYING
District Attorney
Nichols and
Now DA Nichols,
demonstrate your modus operandi by retaliating for having the truth told so
additional charges against you and your operatives can be publicized. Four associates with power of attorney are
standing by to pursue redress whether you have me killed, or once again falsely
imprisoned, and subsequently killed by an inmate. The world is
watching. Google recorded 3.6 million hits for the author and red light camera
after the Knoxville Police Department propagated their fraudulent claims all
over the world. Pay back is hell.
To Assistant District
Attorney, Willie Lane: The author wishes
to express his deepest appreciation for Assistant District Attorney Willie Lane
for having been the biggest ASSet throughout this ordeal. The author is grateful for her ASSistance in
exposing both her own boss and police officers. The author looks forward to her
continued ASSistance in providing further opportunities to successfully
prosecute those that have attempted to fraudulently prosecute the author.
Response
to Indictment of Case No. 90252, Grand Jury No. I-0908-80, A, with counter
claims and proof of criminal acts perpetrated by:
Knoxville
Tennessee District Attorney Randall E. Nichols,
Redflex
Corporation
(This document contains 21 pages)
Corruption within the
city and county government of
Charges levied against Knoxville Tennessee
Officer James Cox 1811
Testimony under
oath of Officer James Cox
Affidavit of Officer
James Cox
Police Report of
Officer James Cox
Testimony under oath of
Officer James Cox 2
Testimony under oath of
Officer Jason Keck
Conclusory proof of evidence
tampering
Officer James Cox
invents the act of “Fleeing”
District Attorney
RANDALL E. NICHOLS invents Cox’s danger
CHARGES LEVIED AGAINST KNOXVILLE TENNESSEE
District Attorney RANDALL E. NICHOLS
Redflex Commits Aggravated Perjury
Charges Levied against
Redflex Corporation
A little more about
District Attorney Randy Nichols and Assistant District Attorney Samyah Jubran.
- End of page 1 -
Mr. Clark
respectfully demands that Officer Cox 1811, be arrested and relieved of duty
for:
1) Aggravated
perjury. — T.C.A. § 39-16-703.
(a) A person commits an offense who, with intent to deceive:
(1) Commits perjury as defined in § 39-16-702;
(2) The false statement is made during or in connection with an official proceeding; and
(3) The false statement is material.
(b) It is no defense that the person mistakenly believed the statement to be immaterial.
(c) Aggravated perjury is a Class D felony.
2) Official oppression - T.C.A. § 39-16-403 prohibits abuse of power by a public servant. Official oppression Class E felony.
3) Official misconduct - T.C.A. § 39-16-402 applies to public servants and candidates for office and prohibits unauthorized exercise of official power, acting in an official capacity exceeding the servant's power, refusal to perform a duty imposed by law, violating a law relating to the servant's office or employment, and receiving a benefit not provided by law.
Official misconduct is a Class E felony with penalty of not less than one (1) year nor more than six (6) years in prison. In addition, the jury may assess a fine not to exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000), unless otherwise provided by statute
4) Inconsistent
statements. — T.C.A. § 39-16-707
Except as provided in § 39-16-704, a charge of perjury or aggravated perjury that alleges the person charged has made two (2) or more statements under oath, any two (2) of which cannot both be true, need not allege which statement is false if both statements were made within the period of the statute of limitations. At trial, the prosecution need not prove which statement is false.
5) Misuse of official information - T.C.A. § 39-16-404
The author have received a bill from Redflex claiming the author owes them damages as a result of Cox’s, Keck’s, and Nichols perjury. The author was defamed by this fraudulent confession. An indictment was fraudulently obtained by Cox’s and Nichol’s perjury. A public servant commits an offense that, by reason of information to which the public servant has access in the public servant's official capacity and that has not been made public, attains or aids another to attain a benefit. An offense of Misuse of official information is a Class B misdemeanor.
An offense of Misuse of official information is a Class B misdemeanor.
6) Ouster law -
T.C.A. § 8-47-101
-Sets out conduct that is punishable by ouster from office, including misconduct in office and neglect of duty.
7) Subornation of
perjury. - T.C.A. §39-16-705
(a) A person commits an offense that, with the intent to deceive, induces another to make a false statement constituting perjury or aggravated perjury.
(b) Subornation of perjury is a Class A misdemeanor. Subornation of aggravated perjury is a Class E felony.
- End of page 2 -
From the preliminary hearing
transcripts, page 17, lines 15 through 22:

Mr. Clark adamantly denies discharging a firearm. No where in the preliminary hearing does anyone make any statement that Mr. Clark confessed to any possible crime. Below is the affidavit sworn under oath by Officer James Cox:
- End of page 3 -

The affidavit by Officer James Cox excludes any
confession of any possible crime.
Notice the following statement made by Officer James Cox and submitted to a grand jury by District Attorney Randall E. Nichols. Long after the alleged incident, James Cox invents a confession which is contradicted within James Cox’s preliminary hearing testimony, and the sworn Affidavit authored by Officer James Cox. However, the invented confession is just the beginning of his perjury. More importantly, Officer Cox revises his entire testimony, affidavits, carefully to eliminate all exculpatory evidence. Knoxville District Attorney Randall E. Nichols maliciously excludes all exculpatory evidence when presenting to a grand jury to fraudulently obtain an indictment:
- End of page 4 -
Police Report of Officer James Cox

Notice that Officer Cox fraudulently recounts a confession above, but specifically excludes the possibility of confession under oath at the preliminary hearing, and the Affidavit of Complaint. Notice that Cox changes the entire sequence of events, and invents events in his report to the grand jury. Notice that Cox changes his narrative of the initial position of responding twice in his own documentation. Both positions testified by Cox are contradicted by the GPS coordinates in his own police car dash camera. The real dash camera GPS position at the initial response will be noted later in this narrative. Notice that Cox testifies that 4 shots were heard before responding, but then changes the sequence of events for the narrative presented to the grand jury. The importance of this alteration will become evident further in this narrative.
- End of page 5 -
Officer Cox claims in
the report above: 
Officer James Cox testifies under
oath in the preliminary hearing, page 17 of the transcripts:

Mr. Clark adamantly denies discharging a firearm. Officer
James Cox fraudulently invented Mens rea, and Actus
- End of page 6 -
Once again, from Officer’s Cox report sent to the grand jury:

-From the preliminary hearing
transcripts, page 47, lines 15 through 22:

-And page 48 from Assistant District
Attorney Willie to Officer Jason Keck:

Officer James Cox
fraudulently invented Mens rea, unambiguously confirmed by the inconsistency of
sworn testimony of Officer Jason Keck and Officer James Cox.
- End of page 7 -
- From page 19 of the preliminary
hearing transcripts:

Now read this from

How did 3 shell casings alleged to have been found by police
in a parking lot end up in a box in Mr. Clark’s car? Again, Officer James Cox fraudulently
invented Mens rea, and Actus
- End of page 8 -
Refer to James Cox’s statement on page 4:

Now refer to

You may view the approximately15 mph speed of travel of Mr. Clark’s vehicle by clicking here, or by typing:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkNfdrWaMkU
within an internet browser. Also, the viewer should be
cognizant of all the traffic on Broadway, despite
Again, Officer James
Cox fraudulently invented Mens rea, and Actus
- End of page 9 -
Notice that Cox states that ‘shots’ and Mr. Clark’s position were explicitly behind Pittman’s Auto in his narrative. The latitude and longitude are:
|
North |
36.1.12' |
|
West |
083.55.295' |
Though earlier he says he doesn’t know where the shots came from: page 8, line 17 of transcripts and affidavit.
The red light camera alleged to have been shot was located at latitude and longitude:
|
North |
36.01.190' |
|
West |
083.55.295' |
Notice that Officer James Cox is shown in the police car dash camera below, responding to this alleged incident from the latitude and longitude of (see red circle below):

The video demonstrating and confirming Officer Cox’s initial responding position can be viewed by clicking here, or by typing www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJLKwKf-msw
The police car dash video
dispels any contradictory claims of any other position when Officer
James Cox responded. Cox and Nichols
purposefully lied to a grand jury to fraudulently obtain an indictment.
I received some questions from readers about the
latitude and longitude reported by Cox’s dash camera. The longitude and latitude reported by the
dash cam are given in decimal format. Google Earth plots by degrees, minutes,
and seconds. A Federal Communications
Commission conversion link is given below, so that you can plot the lat and lon
for yourself. If you look at the
building where the upper red arrow points on the map below, you can see the
wall that Cox was facing in the police video when he switched on his lights and
bolted from the parking lot on to Broadway and toward the red light
camera.
- End of page 10 -
This latitude and longitude are plotted on Google Earth:

You can check the coordinates yourself with this converter:
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/DDDMMSS-decimal.html
Review the Affidavit of Complaint of Officer James Cox on page 4:
![]()
Officer Cox testifies
that four shots occurred before looking for ‘the shooter’. Now,
read the completely revised account that District Attorney Randall E. Nichols
sent to the Grand Jury:
- End of page 11 -

Not only did District Attorney Randall E. Nichols present a fraudulent confession to the grand jury, District Attorney Randall E. Nichols and Officer James Cox further committed aggravated perjury to obtain an indictment by fraudulently placing Officer Cox in a location contradicted by Officer Cox’s dash camera, and Officer Cox’s Affidavit of Complaint. Officer Cox completely revised his narrative for the grand jury. District Attorney Randall Nichols had every item displayed in this webpage available to him when he chose to seek an indictment. District Randall Nichols removed all exculpatory evidence from the presentation to the grand jury. Cox and Nichols engaged in Felony Official Oppression and Felony Official Misconduct as well as Felony Aggravated Perjury.
- End of page 12 -
Mr. Clark respectfully demands that District Attorney Randall E. Nichols be arrested and relieved of sevice for:
1) Aggravated
perjury. — T.C.A. § 39-16-703.
(a) A person commits an offense who, with intent to deceive:
(1) Commits perjury as defined in § 39-16-702;
(2) The false statement is made during or in connection with an official proceeding; and
(3) The false statement is material.
(b) It is no defense that the person mistakenly believed the statement to be immaterial.
(c) Aggravated perjury is a Class D felony.
2) Official oppression - T.C.A. § 39-16-403 prohibits abuse of power by a public servant. Official oppression Class E felony
3) Official misconduct - T.C.A. § 39-16-402 applies to public servants and candidates for office and prohibits unauthorized exercise of official power, acting in an official capacity exceeding the servant's power, refusal to perform a duty imposed by law, violating a law relating to the servant's office or employment, and receiving a benefit not provided by law.
Official misconduct is a Class E felony with penalty of not less than one (1) year nor more than six (6) years in prison. In addition, the jury may assess a fine not to exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000), unless otherwise provided by statute
4) Inconsistent statements.
— T.C.A. § 39-16-707
Except as provided in § 39-16-704, a charge of perjury or aggravated perjury that alleges the person charged has made two (2) or more statements under oath, any two (2) of which cannot both be true, need not allege which statement is false if both statements were made within the period of the statute of limitations. At trial, the prosecution need not prove which statement is false.
5) Misuse of official information - T.C.A. § 39-16-404
I have received a bill from Redflex claiming my I owe them damages as a result of Cox’s, Keck’s, and Nichols perjury. I was defamed by this fraudulent confession. An indictment was fraudulently obtained by Cox’s perjury. A public servant commits an offense that, by reason of information to which the public servant has access in the public servant's official capacity and that has not been made public, attains or aids another to attain a benefit. An offense of Misuse of official information is a Class B misdemeanor.
6) Ouster law - T.C.A.
§ 8-47-101
-Sets out conduct that is punishable by ouster from office, including misconduct in office and neglect of duty.
- End of page 13 -
Officer Cox’s testimony, affidavit, and report places Mr. Clark behind Pittman’s business:

Notice that there is no line of sight from position A, B, or C to the red light camera. Position D does have an apparent line of sight to the back side of the red light camera, but position D is explicitly excluded in Cox’s testimony, affidavit, and report, as well as the police video.
-
But, there’s more …
- End of page 14 -
Examine the preliminary hearing
transcript, bottom of page 55 (the entire transcript page is on page 16 of this
narrative):

Top of page 56 of the preliminary hearing
transcripts:

2100 hours is 9:00 P.M, November 24th 2007. Officer James Cox’s dash camera shows himself responding at 1:35 A.M, the day after, but he lied about that and put 1:53 AM on his Affidavit of Complaint, and then he lied about that time for the grand jury documents and changed the time to 1:45 AM. Regardless, the camera became inoperative many hours before any police claimed they heard shots and many hours before Mr. Clark was illegally stopped and falsely arrested.
- End of page 15 -
Redflex under oath during the Preliminary Hearing transcripts page 55:

- End of page 16 -
Here is the spreadsheet of repair costs submitted by Redflex during the preliminary hearing under oath:

- End of page 17 -
Now let’s examine
the documents Redflex provided to District Attorney Randall E. Nichols and that
District Attorney Randall E. Nichols provided to defraud a grand jury:
Total Cost of the Camera:

- End of page 18 -
Total Cost of the Camera repairs submitted to the grand jury:

Mr. Clark respectfully demands that Redflex Corporation be indicted for:
1) Aggravated
perjury. — T.C.A. § 39-16-703.
(a) A person commits an offense who, with intent to deceive:
(1) Commits perjury as defined in § 39-16-702;
(2) The false statement is made during or in connection with an official proceeding; and
(3) The false statement is material.
(b) It is no defense that the person mistakenly believed the statement to be immaterial.
(c) Aggravated perjury is a Class D felony.
2) Inconsistent
statements. — T.C.A. § 39-16-707
Except as provided in § 39-16-704, a charge of perjury or aggravated perjury that alleges the person charged has made two (2) or more statements under oath, any two (2) of which cannot both be true, need not allege which statement is false if both statements were made within the period of the statute of limitations. At trial, the prosecution need not prove which statement is false.
- End of page 20 -
Notice in the following report that there is no ambiguity that Assistant District Attorney Samyah Jubran drove through an intersection with a stop sign without stopping, and after drinking an alcoholic beverage. Yet, she was not given a citation for driving through an intersection with a stop sign regardless of impairment.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWtGxcZWUgw
or by clicking here.
“In the video Officer Dururvurur says, "Here's the deal. You are in no shape to be driving."
“ -But DeBusk maintains that is a tactic used by officers to obtain more information.”
DeBusk is a spokesperson for Knoxville Police Department. So, DeBusk states that lying is a tactic routinely used by KPD officers.
Assistant District Attorney Samyah Jubran has refused to prosecute cops for breaking the law.
During the discovery of illegal vehicle towing contracted by
the City of
District Attorney Randall Nichols refused to prosecute 3 assailants that left me disfigured, although I could identify all of them. Click here for the pictures.
Again DA Nichols, demonstrate your
modus operandi by retaliating for having the truth told so additional charges
against you and your operatives can be publicized. Four associates with power of attorney are
standing by to pursue redress whether you have me killed or once again falsely
imprisoned, and subsequently killed by an inmate. The world is
watching. Google recorded 3.6 million hits for the author and red light camera
after the Knoxville Police Department propagated their fraudulent claims all
over the world. Pay back is hell.
- End of page 21 –
If you’d like to read more about this
complex story, continue below:
How did those camera-charges that lay dormant for
almost a year suddenly end up as an indictment? Is justice slow? Were the courts clogged? - Nope. The author checked the criminal court
docket on a bi-weekly basis. The case
was never on the docket, until mid October, nearly a year after the author’s
false arrest when an indictment was suddenly issued after the case spent
virtually no time on the docket. How did
this anomaly occur?
As the reader may know, the author will post just
about any relevant truth on this website. Mid-October, Assistant District
Willie threaten to have the author arrested for material on this website. Willie makes more idle threats than a World
Wrestling Federation TV wrestler. However, instead of cowering, the author
placed Willie’s threats on the website. Days later, an indictment was issued
for charges that were nearly a year old without previously having been on the criminal
docket. That indictment allowed the
author to expose both Willie’s boss and the cops engaging in felony aggravated
perjury, felony official oppression, and felony official misconduct; not to
mention other crimes. Thank you,
Willie. I love
you baby-doll. Willie works in
General Session Court, but just happened
to show up in criminal court when my indictment was read aloud. What a
coincidence! However, she wanted me arrested,
but no arrest took place: coitus interruptus!
Nevertheless, after Sheriff’s deputies
permanently damaged my left shoulder, I can no longer put both of my hands
behind my back. I suspect they’ll break
my shoulder the next contrived arrest, and then claim they were just following
procedure.
So how did the
THE
TO COVER
ILLEGAL ACTIVITY
THE AUTHOR IS TWICE AN HONOR GRADUATE
FROM THE
This incredulous headline
is well supported by documentation available to the reader:
1)
The University of Tennessee had the
author arrested for the content of author’s website mildly critical of UT’s policies,
yet fabricated a trespassing charge, after sending an invitation to come to
campus. Document 1 takes a little time to download, but is essential. Document
1 was obtained from the
2)
The
3)
Without a legitimate reason to ban
the author, the
4)
The
5)
The
6)
The
7)
The
8)
Students at the
9)
If the University had been
successful in creating a Virginia Tech and Columbine style massacre, the
University would be spared an investigation into their accreditation, and
financially damaging litigation for malicious prosecution, perjury, breech of
due process of law, breech of UT’s own bylaws, and breech of accreditation
requirements of the Commission
on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges.
10)
The
11)
Plain clothes, unidentifiable
sheriff’s deputies broken into the author’s home. When the author defended his life, deputies
then identified themselves and piled on erroneous charges. If not for the author’s shot gun and cell
phone on speaker, the author would not be alive. This home invasion was by
direction of the administration of the
12)
The author underwent physical
assault by 3 people after deputies tore tendons in the author’s arm. Yet, the same sheriff's department that broke
into the author’s home, tore tendons in the author’s arm, and stole over $9000
of property, refused to arrest the violent assailants, and the DA refused to
prosecute the violent assailants. Click
here for documentation. Sheriff JJ is a UT alumnus.
13)
Prosecutor
14)
Prosecutor
15)
Prosecutor
16)
Prosecutor
17)
The
18)
The
SCENES FROM
INCARCERATON THE MYTH OF IMMUNITY
If you have difficulty believing the
statements made within this web page, carefully re-examine the documents provided. Additionally, I want you learn about
something that school won’t teach you: Operation Northwoods Click on the hyperlink, and read.
The University administration has
little concern for your children, your children’s careers or your children’s
future. The University wants your MONEY. My credentials for this
assertion are that I am twice an honor graduate from the
The University confiscated all of
the equipment purchased by the students of the canoe and hiking club
with the student’s own money. The totalitarian administration of
The University can fail a student
and then charge them again for taking the same course. Suppose we change that policy. A student pays once for a course, no matter
how many times they have to repeat it. Stand back and watch the quality of
instruction soar. Stand back and watch
instructor salaries increase and administrator’s salaries decrease. No longer
will a fire hose of data be sprayed on students, and then a grading curved used
to pass or fail them. A staggering 190,000 people in the
The knowledge a student needs to
excel in their careers will not be taught, and the knowledge students are
taught is largely superfluous. The
University wants your MONEY. Their whole structure is constructed to
take parent’s retirement money, and bury the students in debt. Shortly, a University credit card will be
pushed on your children so that the University takes the interest upon the debt
with which they indenture their students. While University claims to make money
from UT sponsored sports, they take money from the students to support their
sport programs and pay administrators exorbitant sums of money while short
changing instructors. Yet, the reader
will purchase UT logo merchandise as some sort of perverted status symbol.

What is occurring at the
UNIVERSITY
THEFT DECLINING
VALUE OF A COLLEGE EDUCATION
WHERE
YOU’RE MONEY IS GOING WHERE
YOU’RE MONEY WENT
22 YEAR OLD WOMAN AUCTIONS OFF HER VIRGINITY TO PAY FOR HER COLLEGE
LOANS
THE
PRELIMINARY HEARING WAS A LITANY OF PERJURY:
PERJURY TO GET AN ARREST
WARRNT
DEPUTIES COMMIT
PERJURY PART 1
DEPUTIES COMMIT
PERJURY PART 2
DEPUTIES COMMIT
PERJURY PART 3
DEPUTIES COMMIT PERJURY PART 4
DEPUTIES COMMIT
PERJURY PART 5
THE ENTIRE HEARING UNINTERRUPTED
I have been attacked
twice.
Click here to see the pictures. I have also received documentation indicating that the
Sheriff’s office is going to attempt to implicate me in yet another fantasy
crime. If I’m found floating face down in the river or murdered (“apparent
suicide”) in a jail cell on some bogus charge, you’ll know it was the sheriff’s
department working in concert with the
Self-perpetuating Legal System:
Hopefully in the future, whenever you read about some one being charged by a
law enforcement agency, you’ll recognize the charges are often nothing but
provocation or retaliation by the law enforcement agency and have nothing to do
with criminal activity. In reality, a
person is considered guilty until proven innocent, rather than innocent until proven
guilty. Police will pile on erroneous
charges so that a person spends tens of thousand of dollars to prove their
innocence. Hypothermia and physical
threats are used routinely in local incarceration. If such activity were practiced in
OBSERVATIONS
CONCERNING LAW ENFORCEMENTclick here
Friend to
Cliff: “Cliff, you’ve got to pick your battles.”
Cliff to
Friend: “I did. I picked the battle for
justice.”
PLEASE
BOYCOTT THE
THANK YOU.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn
died at age 89 on 0-8-04-08. Many
Americans do not recognize Solzhenitsyn.

In 1944, Solzhenitsyn was
a captain in the Soviet Army fighting against the Nazis. As if this bravery weren’t enough, Alexander
began to criticize Joseph Stalin. As a
consequence of his criticism, Alexander spent 8 years doing back-breaking labor
in Soviet Gulags. His major novels uncover the hidden world of prisons, labor
camps, and food shortages. His books,
which were best sellers in the West, destroyed any remaining sympathy for the
Communist regime among left-wing intellectuals, and inspired millions with the
message that personal courage can defeat a totalitarian regime. I hope this short mention of Alexander
inspires the reader to learn more about this unique man of history.
A LITTLE
ABOUT CLIFF:
Some men
are born to greatness. Other men have greatness thrust firmly up their rectums.
Connie baby sat me when I was 5 years old
Connie and Me, and the
standard of death in America. Connie’s family is from
This is Cliff’s sponsored Child in
The following are former employees of Cliff, and people
that continue to be friends:





Cliff’s words: A special note on
this woman: We were almost married. She is a practicing Muslim. This was a very different world for me to
explore. I was a non-practicing
Catholic. Since before the 11th
century, our respective ethnicities and cultures have been trying to kill one
another. It took me a little while to
get comfortable with someone that put on clothing like this:

5 times each day she would dress
like this, unroll a prayer mat, place a prayer stone (Shiite) on the mat, face
Mecca, and pray just like you’ve seen on the fear-inducing nightly news. It was slightly unnerving at first, and then
it became endearing. Was this so far
removed from customs of nuns in the Catholic Church? I carried a compass so that she could find


MAI

Mai was my Vietnamese
squeeze. Boy, did she have a
temper. Fortunately, because of her
accent, I could not understand anything she said when she was angry. So, I rarely took offense. We dated for four months before I ever kissed
her.
The people that have shared
their lives with me are as numerous as the stars in the sky. When I look up at night, I am reminded of
each one. I am deeply grateful for every
one of them. Thank you for letting me
share a small portion of my life with you.
